Showing posts with label Government of India. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Government of India. Show all posts

Saturday, July 28, 2012

Legalism for Latecomers



In ancient China there was only one punishment for reporting late for government work - death.

This, and various other interesting facts tumbled out a book I've been reading: Paul S. Ropp's "China in World History".

During the Warring States Period (403-221BCE), the Qin 'First Emporer' of China and his brilliant minister Li Sim instituted what was to be the first built on iron-clad Rule of Law and the promotion of meritocracy over feudal aristocracy. As in the case of late reporting for work,  strict laws and punishment were based on the theory that harsher the punishment, the less it would have to be used.

This was statecraft based on a philosphy called Legalism.

The state of Qin was also the first to abolish serfdom and hand over land to the farmers. It also promoted soldiers and officials purely on merit.

Perhaps this is something to think about when one drives around central New Delhi, and sees hundreds of government officials lolling about on the lawns, chatting and sipping chai during working hours..

--------------------------------------------------------

REFERENCE:

Ropp, Paul S (2010): CHINA IN WORLD HISTORY, Oxford University Press 2010


Saturday, August 27, 2011

Two Highways in Kerala


For anybody traveling out of Thiruvananathapuram by road, there are essentially two choices - the national highway (NH-47) or the Main Central (MC) Road. Both run through the length of Kerala with the NH mostly hugging the coastline and lagoons, while the MC is a roller-coaster snaking through the central hills and valleys.

Yesterday we had to make a round trip to Chertala (literally "Swamp Head"), around 180km from Tvm. For the onward journey we drove down the NH and returned in the evening using the MC. It was a journey that provided a glimpse into the patchwork of intentions that marks infra development in Kerala.

The National Highways are built and owned by the central government, with its management being outsourced to the state. In Kerala it follows the minimum national standards so we have a two-lane configuration all through. The poor quality of construction and maintenance is apparent in many places - potholes, loose gravel and traffic jams. The MC road, on the other hand, is now a strange animal - something of a cross between an autobahn and a bullock-cart track.

The stretch from Changanaserry to Pantalam is the bullock-cart patch, with the traffic crawling at snailpace through narrow, broken roads and single-lane bridges. Then, suddenly, as you approach Pandalam, you have stretches that are so perfect that it is difficult to believe that you are on the same highway! The two-lane highway now comes with clearly demarcated shoulders, lanes and crossings. The stretch is so good that you now have the time to take in the lush green hills and paddies dotting the countryside.

Strangely, there is no sign of any further effort to make the MC Road consistently better.  The complete absence of road construction equipment along the way makes you wonder what brought about this patchwork quilt where excellence and mediocrity sit side by side.


........................................................................
LINKS:

World Bank Project & Operations (2009): India: Kerala State Transport Project; URL - http://web.worldbank.org/external/projects/main?Type=Overview&theSitePK=40941&pagePK=64283627&menuPK=64282134&piPK=64290415&Projectid=P072539

Status Report: India - Kerala State Transport Project : P072539 - Implementation Status Results Report : Sequence 21; URL - http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=0000A8056_2011012510353917

Kumar, Sanjeev V (2006): Kerala State transport project second phase to be launched next month, The Hindu BusinessLine 20 Jan 2006; URL - http://www.thehindubusinessline.in/2006/01/20/stories/2006012002272100.htm

Friday, August 12, 2011

SMEs: Mittelstand and Chuken Kigyo

.
An interesting article in the Economist drew my attention back to Small & Medium Enterprises and to the combination of factors that makes them world class players in Germany and Japan, but not in India.

The article titled GERMANY'S MITTELSTAND - BEATING CHINA (Economist 5 Aug 2011) takes the example of KSB Pumps to describe the unique industrial ecosystem in in Germany where  universities work hand-in-glove with manufacturers; of suppliers clustering around big manufacturers and of owner-managers' rubbing shoulders with workers.

In Japan, such companies are called chuken kigyo (strong, medium-sized firms), and they serve more than 70% of the worldwide market in at least 30 technology sectors worth more than $1 billion apiece. Their niche areas are mostly at the high-end of electronics, engineering and materials-science.

Israel, Taiwan and South Korea have also managed to replicate similar models for SMEs.

What prevents Indian SMEs from building a similar reputation for world-class quality?
------------------------------------------------------------

REFERENCES / LINKS:

GERMANY'S MITTELSTAND - BEATING CHINA (Economist 5 Aug 2011) URL - http://www.economist.com/node/21524922

Venohr (2010): "The power of uncommon common sense management principles - The secret recipe of German Mittelstand companies - Lessons for large and small companies", 2nd Global Drucker Forum Vienna 2010, URL - http://www.druckersociety.at/repository/2010/day01/15%2730-17%2700/Venohr_101118_PPT_Beamerversion.pdf

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

God's Own Garbage



In Thiruvananthapuram, there is a new way of disposing household garbage - it is called "toss and scoot". 

Even in the most affluent areas, one can now witness something, which until recently, was rare in Kerala : the unedifying sight of citizens rolling down windows of their air-conditioned cars, to toss out plastic packets full of garbage on to public sidewalks or any blind corner deemed to be "no man's land".

A good example of this practice can be seen on the road going down from the upmarket PTP Nagar to Maruthankuzhi. Also known as Pipeline Road, this is one of the few straight roads in the city, gently sloping down the hill with a Forest Department plantation on one side and the Army cantonment property on the other. It is a lovely, green stretch.  However, a hundred meter's down this road, just beyond a board welcoming you to PTP Nagar, piles of garbage adorn both sides of the road. And just when you're wondering how so much garbage had come to occupy such a large area, a car speeds by, a window rolls down and yet another garbage projectile hits the ground, scattering its contents down the slope. Domestic servants and morning walkers toss in their packets at a more leisurely pace, much to the delight of crows and stray dogs.

The same pattern is repeated in most parts of the city - except in the areas surrounding the Raj Bhavan and Kowdiar. In the narrow lanes of Vazhutacaud, Elipode and Pettah, where you cannot hide behind the anonymity of a faceless, speedy car, the garbage packets are surreptitiously dropped in blind corners or empty plots. In Vattioorkavu  one spot has packets piled right under a Residents Welfare Association (RWA) board pleading in Malayalam - "For God's sake, please don't drop your garbage here!".

In keeping with Wilson & Kelling’s “Broken Window Theory”, a single garbage packet, lying unattended for a couple of days attract many more such packets, and soon, a pile builds up. Some get tossed into open drains and rivulets, increasing the chances of flooding during the monsoons.

Why is it that the allegedly 'most educated people', in the most literate state in the country, are so indifferent and callous to public hygiene? Is it merely a failure of the civic administration or is these pointer's to a deeper societal problem?

The civic administration does have a scheme in place, under the Kudumbasree program. Each of the eighty-six wards under the city corporation has a team of women who set about early in the morning, going from house-to-house collecting garbage. Each household is supposed to hand over segregated the garbage to the workers, who pack them into crates for further processing at their facility at Vilappilsala, 16 km East of the city.
This is, of course, the plan. In practice, the Kudumbasree workers regularly face householders who grudge them even the token monthly charge of Rs.40. Since most of the packets they receive are un-segregated, they go about using their bare hands to pull out kitchen & food waste from piles that invariably contain razor blades, rusty cans, broken bulbs and glass shards. An exasperated worker at Elipode says, "We keep requesting the people to give us segregated garbage, but nobody listens!"

The situation at Vilappilsala processing centre is often the subject of controversies. The plant was commissioned in 1999-2000 and is presently being run by a quasi-government agency - the Centre for Environment & Development. Spread across an area of 43 acres, the Vilappisala facility has the capacity to convert 200 tonnes of biodegradable garbage per day using aerobic reactors as well as mechanical composting. The choice of technology has raised a stink and, in response to vociferous protests from residents in surrounding areas, the government is restricting the inflow to just 100 tonnes per day - half its built capacity. 

According to a paper presented by Edward and Kumar (2009 CET Trivandrum), the problem of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) disposal in Trivandrum city is typical of the problem faced by all states in India. Lack of financial resources, institutional weaknesses, improper choice of technology and public apathy towards MSW has made this service far from satisfactory. Two years ago, the city produced an average of 145 tonnes of garbage per day and now, there just not enough land available for conventional landfills and processing plants.

Given the precarious finances of the Kerala state government, it may be unrealistic to expect quick-fix, high-tech solutions. What can be addressed incrementally are the institutional weaknesses, but, ultimately, the crux of the problem rests on one single issue: public apathy. 

Perhaps the only cure to this ailment is a sustained, carefully crafted campaign involving  households, RWA's, schools as well as entrepreneurs’ involved in the waste-recycling business. In consultation with the RWA's, each area should have clearly demarcated points for garbage disposal, provided, if necessary with wire-mesh enclosures or nets that blocks free access to scavenging birds and animals.  

Chennai city produces 3500 tonnes of garbage and, after years of experimenting, seems to have come up with an effective solution that involves private enterprise, RWA’s and the municipality. This model may have some lessons to offer to the people of Thiruvananthapuram.

There is no point procrastinating here. The problem is only going to get worse as the population increases. Until careful planning is backed by concerted action, households - even in the most affluent areas - will continue to toss their garbage out of their cars, or delegate this unpleasant task to their domestic servants.

The Trivandrum Corporation, in consultation with the RWA’s, needs to get proactive on this issue. As of now the corporation website provides only a "White Paper" on the subject, with no information or guidelines on what is to be done with domestic waste, including the tricky issue of disposing non-biodegradable waste - especially the more hazardous items like hospital waste, battery-cells, electronic goods, glassware, fluorescent tube lights and bulbs.

Until this happens, the capital city of God's Own Country will continue be the abode of ironies : a city named after the richest temple in the country, home to Technoparks, high-tech hospitals, satellite & rocket scientists, but one that is incapable of coming up with a creative, effective way of managing its own household garbage.

--------------------------------------------------------------
REFERENCES:

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

When Innovation Meets Red-Tape

.
The Hindu reports that the National Innovation Council has appointed an Israeli consulting firm, Systematic Inventive Thinking (SIT), to help create an "innovation road-map" for India, and to bring about a "culture of innovation" in the country.

The first thought that crossed my mind?  "Oh no! not again!". Yet another case of a street-smart Israeli company preparing the ground to sucker a few millions from Indian bureaucrats. Last time I saw this was in the early 1990's when a company called Netafim used Japanese government grant-aid funds to sell its drip-irrigation system to the Chandrababu Naidu government in Andhra Pradesh. It had been an impressive display of naivete, short-sightedness and lack of self-confidence by government officials, at the cost of Indian firms like Jain Irrigation Systems.

This news-item quotes a SIT Director - "In India there are 80 innovation centers but they don't have a good success rate.". This was not merely a polite understatement but a clear build up towards a very effective sales pitch. Why do Indian R&D centers have such a poor record in producing internationally competitive goods? Why is Israel so different?

Perhaps a part of the answer lies in the unique socio-economic environment that seems to be typical of smaller countries that continuously struggle to survive in a tough environment. Like Israel, countries like Japan, Singapore, Finland and Switzerland, depend heavily on international trade. But unlike the others, Israel has effectively leveraged military discipline & bonding into a potent economic tool.

Much has been written in recent years about the secretive dynamos that power the Israeli innovation-machine. Stacy Perman (2010) writes about the military unit-8200 whose alumni have created numerous ground-breaking innovations in the IT business. Dan Breznitz (2007) has written about state-led, rapid-innovation based industrial development in Israel.

SIT's own team is a fine example of the kind of human resources you need in your team before you even start talking about innovation. It states:
Helping organizations and individuals to innovate is not something they teach you in university. Which is why our SIT team members' backgrounds, interests, and skills are so diverse, ranging from electrical, mechanical, and food engineering to business, psychology, cultural studies, and music. Not to mention our collective expertise in Greco-Roman wrestling, guided imagery, shiatsu, backwards speaking and other useful skills.
It is a celebration of diversity way beyond the grimy corridors inhabited by government officials in India. The innovators thrive on thinking out of the box while most of our bureaucrats are incapable of thinking without one.

How on earth will these two worlds meet? How will the bureaucrats sitting in the Planning Commission communicate the pearls of wisdom they receive from SIT to the small & medium enterprises that actually need - but cannot afford - such services? Will the presence of the venerable Mr. Sam Pitroda make a difference to the effectiveness of NIC?

Like Netafim, I can already hear SIT laughing all the way to the bank...  :(

--------------------------------------------------
REFERENCES & LINKS
  • Wadke, Rahul (2011): 'INDIA NEEDS TO NURTURE A CULTURE OF INNOVATION', The Hindu BusinessLine, 28 June 2011
  • Kerbs, Gill (2007): Technology - The Unit, Forbes.com, 2 Aug 2007. URL - http://www.forbes.com/2007/02/07/israel-military-unit-ventures-biz-cx_gk_0208israel.html
  • McElroy, Damien (2010): Israel's unit 8200: cyber warfare, The Telegraph UK. URL - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/8034882/Israels-unit-8200-cyber-warfare.html
  • National Innovation Council, India. URL - http://www.innovationcouncil.gov.in/aboutus/aboutnic.php
  • Perman, Stacy (2010): Spies Inc.: Business Innovation from Israel's Masters of Espionage, Kindle eBook
  • Breznitz, Dan (2007): Innovation and the State - Political Choices and Strategies for Growth in Israel, Taiwan and Ireland, Kindle eBook

Thursday, June 09, 2011

Protecting the Corrupt

 .
During the past few weeks, the UPA government has been making a grand display of its incompetence. Faced with mounting public anger over the issue of corruption and black-money it seems have really lost it. Here are some excepts from the press that reflect my own frustration and angst:

* Editorial, BusinessLine (2011). DO PEOPLE MATTER? The Hindu BusinessLine, 8 June 2011
- The main takeaway for the people is that this government will go to any lengths to protect the corrupt. The mistakes have been well chronicled but it is the ingenuous arguments that now stand out. One is that groups of well meaning citizens cannot be allowed to hijack legislative agenda; the other is that the RSS is behind the anti-corruption movement.
- The first argument - that citizens should not drive the legislative agenda - is intellectually identical to what colonial and Soviet style authoritarian governments tend to use: we know what's good for you... This is sheer effrontery.
- It is the Congress party that has created the National Advisory Committee (NAC), chaired by its President. If it is fine for the (unelected members of) NAC to recommend legislation, why is it not all right for Anna Hazare and Ramdev to do likewise? As Shekesphere said, it is surely a tangled web they weave when they seek to deceive.

* Raghavan, B.S (2011). WILL, NOT MAGIC WAND, IS NEEDED. OpEd The Hindu BusinessLine, 8 June 2011
- All we are getting...from Dr. Singh is alibis and excuses: His helplessness because of coalition compulsions, the imperative need to adhere to legal niceties, the inadvisability of second-guessing ongoing investigations and court proceedings, the inability to take action on allegations pending proof to the hilt; the difficulty in dealing with foreign governments in regard to black money.
- Dr. Singh bends over backwards not to hurt perpetrators of serious crimes but is so very quick in unleashing the Delhi police...on peacefully sleeping men, women and children who had come to join the fight against corruption and black money.

* Mehta, Bhanu Pratap (2011). SECOND TIME AS FARCE. Indian Express, 8 JUne 2011
- The UPA government continues to defy all norms of rationality, morality, commonsense and good judgement. These days it is difficult to make sense of what the government is thinking, if it is thinking at all. But on every measure, the midnight raid on Baba Ramdev and his supporters was an act of wilful perversity. The government may have thought its raid was a show of authority. Instead it made the state look like a set of thuggish weaklings: conducting raids on peaceful congregations in the middle of the night.
- The Congress started with cravenness, then descended to impunity. Then it made the mistake of treating citizens like idiots.
- First, no one claims responsibility for anything (“the party had nothing to do with it”)...Second, there is the consistent threat to use state power to intimidate opponents...Third, there is constant dissimulation. Ramdev is a legitimate interlocutor one minute, he is Satan the next...Fourth, there is the old RSS canard...Fifth, the Congress simply does not get it. Its core problem is a crisis of credibility.What is it about the Congress party that repeatedly produces an intellectual culture that turns intelligent people into self-destructive political animals? It has performed the miracle of turning a moment of great hope for India into a moment of political despair.

* Editorial (2011). THE UPA's POLITICAL BANKRUPTCY. The Hindu, 6 June 2011
- India's black & dirty money...has been analyzed powerfully in Nicholas Shaxson's book, Treasure Islands: Tax Havens and the Men Who Stole the World (The Bodley Head, London, 2011)
- Beleaguered by a multitude of corruption scandals dominated by the 2G-spectrum allocation, (the UPA) has earned the reputation of being the most corrupt dispensation independent India has seen.

* Varadarajan, Siddharth (2011). A WEAKNESS BORN OF BAD INTENT. The Hindu, 6 June 2011
- Corruption was an integral part of the "license-permit raj" of Nehruvian socialism. But it has grown into frightening proportions in our liberalized free market economy.
- The case of a Delhi Minister, Raj Kumar Chauhan, who sought to interfere with tax inspectors even as they conducted a raid at the premises of a private establishment. A complaint filed by a senior IAS officer, Jala Shrivastava...and indicted by Justice Sarin. But nothing was done by the UPA government...The protection afforded to the Delhi minister...shows the extent to which the "system" is programmed to circle its wagons at the first signs of trouble.

Wednesday, June 01, 2011

Chinese Whispers for Indian Importers

.
Thanks to the incessant power outages in Kerala, I needed a rechargable battery for my emergency lamp. At the electrical shops lining Thakaraparambil road in Trivandrum, the battery is easily available . A shopkeeper unpacks a set and I take a look at the product code - it is the correct one. How much does it cost?

"Rs.185", says the shopkeeper.

I turn it over and see that it has a printed sticker marked - "Rs. 75 Maximum Retail Price (MRP)". I protest.

The shopkeeper removes the product from the counter and puts it back on the shelf. "Take it or leave it", he says, "Chinese products always come this way. Even the caller-id machines come with an MRP of Rs.5 but we never sell it for less than Rs.50". Needless to say, there is no proof-of-purchase here - the shops flatly refuse to provide receipts for Chinese goods.

Obviously somebody has cleared the imports based on the MRP, and made a killing. If you consider the fact that just about everything in the electrical goods market is now Chinese, how much is the net excise-duty & tax evasion on account of Chinese imports to India?

Monday, April 11, 2011

India's Ban on Japanese Food Imports


India's food imports from Japan have been relatively insignificant. But on 5 April 2011,  India became the first country to suspended all Japanese food imports. This ban was to be reviewed after three months but within two days of announcement, the government did a U-turn and reversed the decision. What explains this unseemly hurry to impose a meaningless ban, and then to revoke it?

By all accounts, this seems to yet another case of the right hand not knowing that the left hand is up to, within the government of India. The ban seems to have been declared by the Ministry of Health after receiving inputs from the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India, Board of Radiation & Isotope Technology, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and the Indian Institute of Toxicology Research.

Since the Ministry of Trade had not been consulted, it promptly issued a notice rejecting the Health Ministry order. It insisted - perhaps quite rightly - that a blanket ban was unwarranted and that it would merely ask for some extra paperwork (radiation-free certification) from the importers.

At the end of the day, it is the government of India that stood exposed for the incompetence of its senior bureaucrats.

--------------------------------------------------------------

India bans food import from Japan for 3 months (The Hindu, 6 APr., 2011). http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/article1602611.ece

India Ban on Food Imports from Japan - Economist - http://www.economist.com/node/18530743

India Bans Japan Food Imports (Reuters, 5 Apr 2011) - http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703806304576244633790290812.html

India U-turn on Japan food import ban
(MB)  http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/313340/india-uturn-japan-food-import-ban

India does a U-Turn (Sky News, 8 April 2011). http://www.skynews.com.au/businessnews/article.aspx?id=599029&vId= 

Shikata,Takagi,Takashima & Karaki, "Japanese Food Safety Concern: Fact and Fiction" (FCCJ, 11 May 2011) http://www.fccj.or.jp/node/6577

Monday, February 08, 2010

Indian Driving License in Japan

Q - Is an International Driving License (IDL) issued in India, valid in Japan?

A - Technically, maybe. Practically, no.

For the past one year, I have been using the IDL issued by RTO Delhi because Japan is clearly listed among the countries where the document is supposed to be valid, as per bilateral agreements. Since the document is valid only for one year, I went last week to the Unten-Menkyo (Driving Licence) office at Mito, to get it `converted`, as per the local requirements.

As per the rules, you are required to submit, along with the application form -
  1. Driving License
  2. International Driving License
  3. Japanese translation of DL (either by Japan Automobile Federation or by the Indian Embassy)
  4. Alien Registration Card
  5. Photos (2)
  6. Processing Stamp-fees (Yen 2400)
My driving license had been issued by RTO (Sarai Kale Khan, Delhi, 1994), and my IDL (Black booklet, RTO Delhi, valid till 22 Feb. 2010) was issued by the same office in March 2009.  When I contacted the Indian Embassy for the translation they said, `You bring a translation and we`ll attest the document`.  Sure enough, when I submitted my documents on 5 Feb. 2010, they examined the originals, found it in order, and attested the translation (Charge - Yen 1400).

The next day, regrettably, my application was rejected. What was surprising, however, by the reasons given by the officer at Mito for doing so -
  1. The International Driving License issued in Delhi does not conform to the `Geneva` format. Hence it is not recognized in Japan;
  2. The Delhi driving license does not specify the date of issue.
  3. The Delhi driving license is not in a format recognized by Japanese authorities.
The IDL issued by Government of India clearly specifies that the document is valid in Japan. If the Japanese authorities do not share this understanding you may have a situation where Indian citizens using Indian IDL`s are being penalized or harassed for using what they think is a valid document.

I had conveyed this concern by email to the Indian Embassy in Tokyo (embassy@indembjp.org, comsec@indembjp.org, fspic@indembjp.org), but there has been no acknowledgment or response from their side. I guess they are all too busy finalizing the FTAs to bother about such mundane issues.

So if you're planning to get an Indian driving license "converted" in Japan, please make sure it is a new one.  And don`t expect any help from the Indian Embassy in Tokyo.

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Pandits, Nairs, Advisers


While reading Guha's "India After
Gandhi", it was interesting to know about the influence wielded by Kashmiri Pandits during Indira Gandhi's tenure. Collectively known as the 'Pancha Pandavas', these five 'hero's' were -
  1. P.N. Haskar - LSE graduate, a student of mathematics, keenly interested in history (diplomatic & military); Indian ambassador to Austria, first High Commisioner to Nigeria, Dy. High Commisioner to UK (1967) before being called by Indira Gandhi to become her Principal Secretary.
  2. T.N. Kaul - politician turned diplomat
  3. D.P. Dhar - politician turned diplomat
  4. P.N. Dhar - economist turned mandarin
  5. R.N. Kao - policeman turned security analyst; founding Director of RAW

Equally fascinating was the description of V.P. Menon's role - first, before Independence as reforms commissioner and constitutional adviser to successive viceroys (including Lord Mountbatten), and his key role in drafting the Indian Independence Bill. And then his subsequent role in the integration of Indian states, as Secretary to India's first Home Minister, Sardar Patel. He was, according to Guha -

"...a small, alert and ferociously intelligent Malayali from Malabar. Unusually for a man in his position, Menon had come from the ranks. Far from being a member of the elite Indian Civil Service - as other secretaries to the government were - he had joined the government as a clerk and steadily worked his way up...His peers in the ICS derisively called him 'babu Menon', in reference to his lowly origins."


Times, it seems, have changed. Yesterday, the Indian Express came up with a piece under its Monday column, Delhi Confidential, titled, "The More Things Change..." referring to the number Nairs who occupy sensitive positions in the present administration:

  • M.K. Narayanan - former national security adviser (NSA), now governor of West Bengal
  • Shivshankar Menon - MKN's protege; former foreign secretary, present NSA
  • Nirupama Rao - Foreign Secretary
  • G.K Pillai - Home Secretary
  • T.K.A. Nair- Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister
  • (J.N. Dixit - the first NSA was born a Nair before taking his stepfather's surname)

The only name missing in the Express list was Shashi Tharoor. But then, he is neither an advisor nor a bureaucrat. He India's just India's irrepressible twitter-in-chief disguised the Minister of State for External Affairs, committed to unraveling the cocoon of myths & yarns of hypocrisy in the Indian political discourse... :)

----------------------------------------------------

Links / Reference:

Guha, Ramachandra (2007), India After Gandhi [Picador India pp.40-41, 434-435]

"The More Things Change...", Indian Express - Delhi Confidential - 26 Jan 2010 http://www.indianexpress.com/news/the-more-things-change.../571181/

"Manmohan - The Mallu Connection", T.V.R Shenoy, Rediff.com - 2 June 2004



Monday, April 09, 2007

Decoding The Budget Documents

Every year, the Budget Session is a grand jamboree played out on Raisina Hill. It is also a time when the security guys go hyper; North Block is sealed – cameras and mobiles are not allowed inside. On the first floor, extra guards hover around the bronze Nataraja, keeping a sharp eye on the FM’s room.

When finally put together, the Budget documents look like a sibling of the Delhi telephone directory – fat, colorful, heavy and full of fine print. Only the numbers here connect you directly to the lives of 1300 million people in India.

This is an attempt to understand what all the fuss is about.

Under Article 112 of the Indian Constitution, a statement of the estimated receipts and expenditure of the Government of India (GoI) has to be laid before the Parliament (Lok Sabha) w.r.t every fiscal year (1st April—31st March). This statement is called the “Annual Financial Statement” and this AFS is the main Budget document.

AFS shows receipts and payments of the Government in three parts – (1) Consolidated Fund of India, (2) Contingency Fund of India, and (3) Public Account of India.

1. Consolidated Fund: Contains all revenue received by GoI, loans raised and recoveries from loans granted by GoI. All expenditure comes from this fund. Nothing can be withdrawn without an authorization from the parliament.
2. Contingency Fund: To meet urgent, unforeseen expenditure pending authorization from the Parliament. It is an imprest (loan/advance) at the disposal of the President. Corpus – Rs.500 Crores
3. Public Account: Wherever GoI acts as a banker (Public Provident Fund, Small Savings, etc.) the money is kept in this account. This money does not belong to the government so Parliament authorization is not required for payments. This account also holds money from the Consolidated Fund, earmarked by the Parliament for specific projects (mid-day meal scheme, road dev., primary education, etc.)

The Constitution requires the Budget to distinguish expenditure on revenue from other expenditure, so we have two heads (1) Revenue Budget, (2) Capital Budget

1. Revenue Budget: Shows revenue received and the expenditure met from this. Revenue comes from taxes, duties levied by the Union, and also interest and dividends earned. Revenue Expenditure mainly goes for normal running of the Government – paying salaries, repaying loans, grants to states ---- mainly stuff that does not result in creation of assets.
2. Capital budget: Shows capital receipts & payments. Here the receipts from loans raised by GoI -- from the public / foreign banks/ market loans; recovery of state loans, through RBI. Capital expenditure mainly goes into creation of assets (acquisition of land, buildings, machinery, equipment etc.)

Article 150 prescribes how the govt accounting is to be classified so that it can be understood by the Parliament and by the public. Loan repayments and salaries of certain senior officials are exempted from the vote in Lok Sabha – this portion is shown as “expenditure charged” to the Consolidated Fund, separately. This process is called “Appropriation”.

In all, there are 10 documents, some in color coded binding and the others just copies stapled without much ado:

1. Annual Financial Statement of the Central Government for 2007-2008: The main document, containing details of Consolidated Fund, Contingency Fund and Public Account

2. Demands for Grants: Estimates of expenditure from CFI requiring a vote of approval from Lok Sabha under Article-113.

3. The Finance Bill, 2007: Completely relates to taxes – its imposition, abolition, remission, alteration or regulation (under Article 110-1). Over a 100 pages of nothing but amendments.

4. Memorandum Explaining the Provisions in the Finance Bill, 2007 (Purple): This is the key to the Finance Bill. All those terse amendments are explained under various heads, like “Measures to plug revenue leakages”.

5. Budget at a Glance 2007-2008 (Green): A brief on receipts (Rs. 680,521 / $162b) and disbursements (ditto); broad break-up of expenditure – Plan and non-plan; allocation to sectors / ministries / departments. This is the place to look for all those deficits –

· “Revenue Deficit” – revenue expenditure over revenue receipts (Rs.71,478 Cr / $17b)
· “Fiscal Deficit” GFD – (revenue expenses + capital expenses + loan repayments) less (revenue receipts + capital receipts) = Rs.150,948 Cr / $35b)
· “Primary Deficit” = GFD less Gross Interest Payments (Rs.8047Cr / $2b)

6. Expenditure Budget 2007-2008 – Vol-I (Blue): Revenue and Capital disbursements totaling Rs.680,520 Cr ($ 162 b) to various departments and estimates of each under Plan and Non-plan:

· Non-Plan Expenditure – All expenditure not included in the Plan. Could be either Revenue Expenditure or Capital Expenditure; partly obligatory (interest payments, pension charges, statutory transfers to states & UTs); partly for essential functions – defense, internal security, external affairs…. The total is Rs.475,420 Crores ( 69% of total Ex, $113 b). The biggest chunks go towards interest payments & debt servicing (33%, $ 37 b) & defense (20%, $22 b)
· Plan Outlay – Distribution of resources as agreed in the 10th Plan. Covers various projects, programmes and schemes; to states and UTs. Total – Rs. 205100 Cr (31%, $48 b)

7. Expenditure Budget 2007-2008 – Vol-II (Orange): Covers schemes or programmes spread across various sections, ministries and departments.

8. Receipts Budget 2007-2008: Details of tax and non-tax revenue receipts, capital receipts; arrears of revenues, deficit indicators, statements on Small Savings Fund, revenue foregone, liabilities, guarantees given by govt., etc. The total money coming into the Consolidated Fund of India is Rs. 2,379,312 Cr ($ 566b) -

· Revenue Receipts = Rs. 583,647 Cr. ($138b), of which Tax Revenue is – Rs. 548,122 Cr. (94%, $ 130b of which $33b goes to the State’s), and Non-Tax Revenue – Rs. 177,975 Cr. ($ 42b). If one includes the excess of disbursements over receipts - Revenue Deficit – of Rs. 71977.8Cr ($17b), the total RR becomes Rs. 655,625 Cr ($ 156b)
· Capital Receipts = Rs. 1,795,665 Cr ($ 427b), of which the total internal debt of the central govt. is Rs. 1,733,533 Cr (96%, $ 412b); External Debt is Rs. 17,451 Cr (1%, $4b)

9. Statement on Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003 – This Act places certain obligations on the Central Govt.; any deviation has to be reported to the Parliament.

10. Key to Budget Documents (Pink)

Soon after the Finance Minister presents these documents to the Parliament, along with his much awaited “Budget Speech” (peppered with some mandatory couplets & slokas), the Opposition and the Media swings into action. The numbers are analyzed threadbare, criticized, debated, written & talked about for weeks on end.

It is a relief to discover that some effort had gone in to make the Budget easier to comprehend. Some big question linger, though -

· If the Budget Receipts add up to $ 566b, how is it that the total Expenditure Budget is only for $ 162b?
· What explains the mismatch of figures for “Budget 2007-2008” in Annual vs. ‘Budget at a Glance’?
· In CFI, net External Assistance is shown as Rs. 17,451 Cr (1%, $4b) but in BaaG it is just Rs.9111 Cr ($2b) – why?